Surveying the peer-reviewed literature “from 1994 to May 2016” the authors looked for peer-reviewed studies where “CFS/ME patients modified their diet or supplemented their habitual diet on patient-centred outcomes (fatigue, quality of life, physical activity and/or psychological wellbeing).”
They found 17 studies that included 14 different interventions. Unfortunately they concluded that: “Many studies did not show therapeutic benefit on CFS/ME” alongside the observation that the methodological quality of the research in this areas ‘could do better’.
But it was not all research doom-and-gloom as some approaches seemed to show promise: “Improvements in fatigue were observed for nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydride (NADH), probiotics, high cocoa polyphenol rich chocolate, and a combination of NADH and coenzyme Q10.”
Without wishing to toot my blogging trumpet, some of these approaches have been discussed before on this blog (Coenzyme Q10 and NADH supplementation for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome? and Coenzyme Q10 and NADH supplementation for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome continued) and beyond that, the target organ of something like the use of probiotics for CFS has made an appearance more than once too.
I might also add that just outside of the search dates used by Campagnolo et al was the suggestion that issues with a staple foodstuff – cows milk – might be over-represented in cases of CFS and that a milk-free diet could be useful for some at least.
By saying all that, I’m not giving any medical or clinical advice…As science starts to move further away from the the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of CFS/ME and starts looking at genetics, biology and somatic disease processes with regards to the various presentations included under the banner of ME/CFS I foresee some interesting developments further down the line.
Granted, dietary and nutritional approaches to CFS/ME are probably not considered ‘mainstream’ in terms of management strategies but that does not mean they aren’t important or at least important in the context of a diagnosis of ME/CFS seemingly being protective of nothing. Central to any future studies in this or any related area is the idea that there may be lots going on under the ‘plural’ diagnostic umbrella of ME/CFS.
Indeed, something that even the PACE trial is starting to take on board.
Campagnolo N, Johnston S, Collatz A, Staines D, & Marshall-Gradisnik S. (2017) Dietary and nutrition interventions for the therapeutic treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a systematic review. Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association. PMID: 28111818
Go to Source
Author: Paul Whiteley, Questioning Answers